This article examines the dismantling of the Azerbaijan National Government in 1946 as a crucial episode in the early Cold War and in Iran’s internal consolidation under Prime Minister Ahmad Qavam. It argues that Qavam’s policy of calculated neutrality between the superpowers allowed him to suppress Azerbaijani autonomy while simultaneously evading Soviet retaliation. The study reassesses the widespread notion that Moscow’s withdrawal from northern Iran represented a tactical retreat, showing instead that Stalin prioritized securing an oil concession over maintaining Azerbaijani self-rule. The paper further demonstrates how Anglo-American diplomatic coordination and Qavam’s political maneuvering transformed the Azerbaijan crisis from a local separatist challenge into a test of postwar power balances in the Middle East. By contextualizing the fall of Azerbaijani autonomy within broader Soviet–Iranian relations, the article highlights the intersection of resource diplomacy, ethnic politics, and emerging Cold War alignments. Ultimately, it contends that the Soviet failure to defend Azerbaijani autonomy not only undermined Moscow’s regional credibility but also reshaped Iranian nationalism and state authority in the aftermath of World War II.
Gulamhuseyn MAMMADOV (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: