In this article, we shall discuss the role of collaborative and transdisciplinary research, and its potential for the co-production of scientific and field knowledge that may serve the purpose of the medical humanities. Transdisciplinary research adds to the challenge of interdisciplinary dialogue – that of involving societal stakeholders to whom the research is accountable. The outcome of such research, in terms of generating knowledge that be both scientifically sound and useful for practice, depends on the quality of the partnerships that are created and constantly discussed and adjusted. We argue that the dialogue between researchers, patients, and clinicians, as well as between disciplines and methods, which is key in this type of research, is likely to increase healthcare providers’ sensitivity to their patients’ emotional and social states and needs, as well as their reflexivity about their own experiences and practices. We are, however, aware of some possible risks and drawbacks associated with this type of research. These are acknowledged and discussed. An important issue in researching the lived experience of chronic illness is that of identity work. We shall use this conceptual category to illustrate, with reference to our own work, the role of triangulating concepts and methods from different disciplines, the role of involving relevant stakeholders in meaningful ways, and the role of the researchers’ own subjectivity and reflexivity in constant dialogue with those of the co-researchers, while conducting research on phenomena of significance to the field of medical humanities.
Aujoulat et al. (Fri,) studied this question.