December 11, 2019Open Access

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach. Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Cite This Study

Grudniewicz et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01e18de8ec6bd19dcb08b8 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Discussion

Journals

Nature

Institutions

University of British Columbia

McGill University

Karolinska Institutet

References and Citations

Add This Paper to Your Research Feed

Any time a new paper drops it will be there.

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Discussion

Journals

Institutions

References and Citations

Also Consider