Objectives To determine best practices in Para athletics talent identification and development through a Delphi survey. Methods A three round Delphi survey was conducted with experts in Para athletics talent identification and development. Round One aimed to elicit insights into the current practices and beliefs in talent identification and development in Para athletics using open ended questions. Round One survey responses were analysed and collated into statements which formulated Round Two, where respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with these statements. Where consensus was reached (i.e., an agreement level of 75%) no further questions were asked regarding the topic of that statement. Where consensus was not achieved, the statements were revised and carried forward to Round Three. Respondents were required to, again, rate their level of agreement with these statements. Results A total of 23 experts completed three survey rounds (Round One, n = 31; Round Two, n = 24; Round Three n = 23). Thematic analysis of Round One identified themes such as quantitative assessment, coaching approaches, and physical and psychological attributes of athletes. Of 20 statements in Round Two, nine reached consensus. Of 14 statements in Round Three, seven reached consensus. Conclusion Consensus was reached on key talent identification and development strategies including quantitative performance assessments, individualised athlete development plans and high levels of coaching experience and expertise. Together, these approaches contribute to a more structured and evidence-based pathway for athlete progression.
Carroll et al. (Mon,) studied this question.