Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
During the transition of global energy systems toward low-carbon and high-reliability operation, nuclear power plant (NPP) operation and maintenance require environmental perception methods that are safe, energy-efficient, and sufficiently accurate for confined and radiation-risk areas. To address these requirements, this paper proposes an energy-oriented multi-robot collaborative exploration and mapping framework, termed I-WFD-Gmapping-DT. The framework integrates a digital twin (DT) 5+3 model, improved wavefront frontier detection (I-WFD), energy- and risk-aware task allocation, EKF-AMCL-based initial relative pose estimation, and multi-scale Gmapping map fusion. Unlike conventional frontier-based or single-objective exploration methods, the proposed utility function jointly considers discounted information gain, obstacle-sensitive path cost, estimated battery energy, angular dispersion, and safety constraints. A ROS-Gazebo simulation of an NPP-like environment was used for 30 independent runs with randomized seeds and starting perturbations. Compared with WFD-Gmapping, the proposed method increased the three-robot coverage area percentage from 35.6 ± 2.1% to 40.5 ± 1.9%, reduced exploration time by 13.35%, reduced total and used frontier target points by 38.9% and 23.24%, respectively, and reduced estimated energy consumption by 13.9%. Map accuracy was also improved, with AE decreasing from 12.45% to 11.52%, RMSE from 7.85% to 7.18%, and SSIM increasing from 0.78 to 0.83. Additional sensitivity, ablation, runtime, and initial-pose experiments confirm the robustness of the parameter selection and the contribution of the DT-enabled feedback mechanism. The results show that I-WFD-Gmapping-DT can enhance collaborative inspection efficiency, reduce redundant motion and energy consumption, and provide reliable mapping support for intelligent NPP operation and maintenance.
Wu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: