Objectives: The decision to withdraw treatment in patients with metastatic cancer is a complex and emotionally charged process influenced by multiple interrelated factors. Despite its significant clinical and ethical implications, this phenomenon remains insufficiently explored through qualitative inquiry. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing decisions to withdraw treatment among patients with metastatic cancer. Methods: A qualitative study using conventional content analysis was conducted. Fourteen patients with metastatic cancer were purposively selected. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the qualitative content analysis approach proposed by Graneheim and Lundman. Data organization was facilitated using MAXQDA software. Results: The analysis yielded 1 main theme ("Finding the meaning of life, and freedom from cycles of suffering"), 4 categories, and 15 subcategories. The overarching theme suggests that understanding life's meaning enables patients to situate their illness within a broader existential purpose, thereby affirming life's intrinsic value beyond mere physical survival. The 4 categories were social and family influences, physical health factors, psychological determinants, and divine and spiritual beliefs. Conclusions: This study outlines a multilevel approach to improving end-of-life care. At the clinical level, holistic nursing assessments are needed to guide transitions to palliative care. At the institutional level, implementing structured protocols with multidisciplinary support and financial counseling is essential. At the national level, policies should ensure universal health coverage and promote cultural acceptance of dignified treatment withdrawal. These findings provide actionable insights for healthcare administrators and policymakers and offer a foundation for strategies aimed at reducing barriers and improving access to supportive care services.
Abadi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.