Abstract Background Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) is an extremely rare subtype, accounting for ~1% of breast cancers but representing the most common malignant breast tumor in pediatric patients. Although generally indolent, SBC carries a risk of local recurrence even decades after treatment. Its defining molecular hallmark is the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Case Presentation We describe a previously healthy six-year-old girl who presented with a 10 × 10 mm retroareolar breast mass. Histopathology revealed lobular tumor architecture with microcystic, cribriform, and tubular patterns, PAS-positive secretory material, and pronounced mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positivity for S-100, MUC4, EGFR, and GATA3, with partial ER expression (20%), PR negativity, and HER2 negativity. Due to margin involvement after excisional biopsy, a simple mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed, followed by axillary dissection after six months for suspicious lymph nodes, which proved benign. Genetic Findings Germline testing (BRCA1/2, TP53, PTEN, CHEK2, PALB2, and others) was negative, excluding hereditary predisposition. Tumor profiling confirmed the canonical in-frame ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (ETV6 exon 5 – NTRK3 exon 13). Therapeutic Implications The presence of ETV6-NTRK3 not only confirms the diagnosis but also identifies a potential therapeutic target. TRK inhibitors (larotrectinib, entrectinib, repotrectinib) are FDA/EMA-approved for pediatric and adult solid tumors with NTRK fusions and have demonstrated high and durable response rates. Outcome Six years after surgery, the patient remains disease-free without evidence of recurrence or metastasis. Conclusion This case highlights the importance of integrating histopathology with molecular profiling in pediatric SBC. The identification of ETV6-NTRK3 provides diagnostic specificity and offers a precision oncology option in the event of relapse. Long-term surveillance and multidisciplinary follow-up remain essential for optimal care.
Vlahović et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: