Marine spatial planning (MSP) has emerged as a key governance approach for managing competing uses of marine space. However, implementing MSP in federal governance systems presents unique challenges due to the distribution of authority across multiple levels of government and sectoral institutions. This study examines the governance feasibility of MSP in Peninsular Malaysia by analyzing the interaction between constitutional arrangements, as well as legal, policy, institutional, and stakeholder perspectives. The coastal districts of Kuala Terengganu and Kuala Nerus are examined as potential pilot areas for exploring MSP implementation within existing planning mechanisms. This study adopts a qualitative governance analysis based on document review and stakeholder perspectives. Relevant constitutional provisions, policy documents, and institutional mandates are analyzed using qualitative coding in ATLAS.ti and synthesized through a Thematic Analysis Matrix. The findings indicate that Malaysia possesses several governance elements necessary for initiating MSP, including the statutory spatial planning system under the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 (Act 172) and policy recognition of coastal–marine integration. However, governance responsibilities remain dispersed across administrative levels and sectoral agencies. This study proposes a governance pathway demonstrating how MSP may be incrementally integrated within existing spatial planning mechanisms, through Local Plan adaptation and strengthened institutional coordination.
Salimun et al. (Thu,) studied this question.