Champions are individuals who demonstrate strong commitment to promoting sustained implementation efforts through their expertise, enthusiasm, and influence, and are known to enable the implementation of evidence-based educational programs. However, existing research has predominantly examined champion effectiveness during implementation and early sustainment phases, with limited attention to their role in long-term program or innovation sustainment. This study investigated how champions influence organisational capacity for sustained program implementation over extended timeframes. A multiple case study design examined champion dynamics across three Australian organisations sustaining implementation of the Abecedarian Approach Australia (3a) for 10 or more years. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 participants, including senior leaders, program managers, educational leaders, and practitioners. Thematic analysis informed by critical realist epistemology identified mechanisms through which champions influenced long-term sustainability. Cross-case analysis suggested the presence of what we term a ‘champion paradox’: the factors that make champions effective in driving implementation may simultaneously create systemic vulnerabilities that can threaten long-term program sustainability. Across these cases, the paradox appeared to operate through three interconnected mechanisms: (1) knowledge concentration, where expertise accumulates in individuals rather than organisational systems; (2) dependency creation, where organisations become reliant on champions for quality assurance, problem-solving, and program continuity; and (3) system capacity prevention, where champion effectiveness conceals organisational need for systematic capacity building. These mechanisms were interpreted as forming a self-reinforcing cycle that may strengthen champion dependency while inhibiting organisational independent capacity. The champion paradox framework invites reconsideration of widespread assumptions that individual champions inherently strengthen organisational implementation capacity. Findings suggest potential value of a shift from champion-dependent to more system-dependent implementation models, with implications for champion selection and development, organisational design, sustainability assessment, and policy frameworks. Implementation strategies may be strengthened by positioning champions as transitional resources focused on building collective organisational capacity rather than as permanent drivers of program quality.
Stark et al. (Thu,) studied this question.