Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Ranked list truncation aims to cut the ranked results in short considering user-defined objectives, which balances the overall utility and user efforts over retrieval results. The exact selection of an optimal cut-off position brings potential benefits in various real-world applications, such as patent search and legal search. However, there is significant retrieval bias in the ranked list. The result scores and the disorder of document sequences cause difficulties in judging the relevance between the queries and documents -- alleviating the existing methods' performance improvement. In this work, we investigate the characteristics of retrieval bias on altering truncation and propose a multi-task truncation model, MtCut. It employs two auxiliary tasks to make complementary for the retrieval bias. As a practical evaluation, we explore its performance on two datasets, and the results show that MtCut outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on both F1-score and DCG metrics.
Wang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: