Given the depletion of conventional oil and gas resources, oil shale represents a promising alternative source of hydrocarbons that can be recovered through pyrolysis. This study examines the thermal decomposition of raw oil shale from the Tarfaya deposit and its decarbonized concentrate, studied by thermogravimetric analysis at different heating rates (5, 10, 20 and 40 °C/min). Pretreatment with acetic acid enabled the selective removal of calcite, confirmed by elemental, XRF, and XRD analyses, which revealed a relative enrichment in silica and dolomite in the oil shale concentrate. Pyrolysis of the raw shale occurs primarily between 300 and 500 °C, with a conversion rate of approximately 30%. In contrast, for the oil shale concentrate, the pyrolysis process begins at a relatively low temperature, within a wider temperature range (260–520 °C). Kinetic analysis based on Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) and Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) methods shows that at a conversion rate of 60%, the activation energy achieves 14.09 kJ/mol and 10.78 kJ/mol, respectively. The results indicate that the selective removal of calcite by acetic acid treatment facilitates kerogen pyrolysis by reducing mineral–organic interactions. Indeed, calcite dilutes the reactive organic fraction and can act as a physical barrier limiting heat and mass transfer within the oil shale. Its removal improves, on the one hand, the accessibility of kerogen to thermal cracking and promotes its decomposition, and on the other hand, reduces the amount of residue after pyrolysis. In addition, the kinetic analysis based on Criado master curves reveals changes in the reaction mechanism after decarbonation treatment depending on the heating rate (β). A shift from a two-dimensional Avrami–Erofeev model (A2) to a three-dimensional model (A3) was observed at a low heating rate (β = 5 °C/min), suggesting a change in nucleation and growth dynamics during kerogen decomposition. At high heating rates (10, 20 and 40 °C/min), the thermal decomposition of kerogen combines several reaction mechanisms depending on the temperature range considered.
Foulah et al. (Fri,) studied this question.