A flutter cycle length >273 ms independently predicted sinus node dysfunction requiring pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent atrial flutter (OR 5.34; 95% CI 3.08-10.08; P<0.0001).
Does flutter cycle length predict underlying sinus node dysfunction requiring permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent atrial flutter?
A flutter cycle length >273 ms in patients with persistent CTI-dependent atrial flutter strongly predicts underlying sinus node dysfunction requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after ablation.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
AIMS: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) occasionally coexists with atrial flutter (AFL). However, the identification of SND during AFL is difficult. We investigated whether we could predict underlying SND in patients with persistent AFL using the flutter cycle length (FCL). METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively studied 211 successfully ablated patients with persistent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent AFL and measured the FCL before the ablation and corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) after the ablation. Twenty-four patients (11%) required a permanent pacemaker implantation (PMI) for significant SND after AFL termination and had a longer FCL (295 ± 37 vs. 236 ± 34 ms; P273 ms as the optimal cut-off value for predicting SND requiring a PMI (area under the curve 0.91; sensitivity, 83% and specificity, 89%; P273 ms (OR, 5.34; 95% CI, 3.08-10.08; P< 0.0001) were independent predictors of SND requiring a PMI. CONCLUSION: Although this study was based on a review of a database, the results suggest that assessing the FCL in patients with persistent CTI-dependent AFL could be helpful in the risk stratification of underlying SND.
Sairaku et al. (Fri,) reported a other. A flutter cycle length >273 ms independently predicted sinus node dysfunction requiring pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent atrial flutter (OR 5.34; 95% CI 3.08-10.08; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: