Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Using a qualitative research methodology detailed by Lincoln and Guba, peer debriefing sessions were examined by interviewing education graduate students who completed dissertations and who participated in peer debriefing. The following patterns emerged: (a) Trust was the foundation for selection of the debriefer and the debriefing interaction, (b) the focus for the debriefer and researcher was on methodology, and (c) research skills were continuously developed. Analysis of the data also showed that debriefers worked in pairs or in small groups. Some debriefing groups met for the total time from proposal to dissertation defense, and others began at different stages of the research process. As a result, some groups relied on memory or journal notes for the review of collected data. Implications are included.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sharon Spall
Stephen F. Austin State University
Qualitative Inquiry
Stephen F. Austin State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sharon Spall (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a579dfdd00ab7863dca18 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049800400208