The BAFTA study is a randomized controlled trial protocol designed to evaluate adjusted dose warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in 1240 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.
RCT (n=1,240)
Yes
Does adjusted dose warfarin reduce fatal or non-fatal disabling stroke or significant arterial embolism compared to aspirin in patients aged 75 years or over with atrial fibrillation?
The BAFTA study protocol describes a randomized trial comparing adjusted-dose warfarin to aspirin for stroke prevention in elderly primary care patients with atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important independent risk factor for stroke. Randomised controlled trials have shown that this risk can be reduced substantially by treatment with warfarin or more modestly by treatment with aspirin. Existing trial data for the effectiveness of warfarin are drawn largely from studies in selected secondary care populations that under-represent the elderly. The Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged (BAFTA) study will provide evidence of the risks and benefits of warfarin versus aspirin for the prevention of stroke for older people with AF in a primary care setting. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial where older patients with AF are randomised to receive adjusted dose warfarin or aspirin. Patients will be followed up at three months post-randomisation, then at six monthly intervals there after for an average of three years by their general practitioner. Patients will also receive an annual health questionnaire.1240 patients will be recruited from over 200 practices in England. Patients must be aged 75 years or over and have AF. Patients will be excluded if they have a history of any of the following conditions: rheumatic heart disease; major non-traumatic haemorrhage; intra-cranial haemorrhage; oesophageal varices; active endoscopically proven peptic ulcer disease; allergic hypersensitivity to warfarin or aspirin; or terminal illness. Patients will also be excluded if the GP considers that there are clinical reasons to treat a patient with warfarin in preference to aspirin (or vice versa). The primary end-point is fatal or non-fatal disabling stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or significant arterial embolism. Secondary outcomes include major extra-cranial haemorrhage, death (all cause, vascular), hospital admissions (all cause, vascular), cognition, quality of life, disability and compliance with study medication.
Mant et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,240). Warfarin vs. Aspirin was evaluated on Fatal or non-fatal disabling stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or significant arterial embolism. The BAFTA study is a randomized controlled trial protocol designed to evaluate adjusted dose warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in 1240 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: