Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case-control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Margaret S. Pepe
Dartmouth College
Ziding Feng
Jilin University
Holly Janes
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Fred Hutch Cancer Center
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pepe et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cdde1d09dbb66ef026212 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn326
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: