An ABCD2 score <4 failed to safely rule out high-risk disease, with 20% of these patients requiring urgent treatment compared to 31.6% of patients with a score ≥4.
Observational (n=1,176)
Does an ABCD2 score <4 safely allow delayed evaluation in patients with a transient ischemic attack?
An ABCD2 score <4 does not safely exclude the presence of high-risk disease requiring urgent treatment in TIA patients, challenging guidelines that allow delayed evaluation.
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 31.6%
Background and Purpose— The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends that patients with a transient ischemic attack and ABCD 2 score ≥4 and those with >2 transient ischemic attacks within 1 week be admitted for urgent complete etiologic evaluation within 24 hours and that those with an ABCD 2 score <4 be evaluated less urgently within 1 week. Methods— Using data from 1176 patients with a definite or possible transient ischemic attack or minor stroke included in the SOS-TIA registry (January 2003 to June 2007), we studied the usefulness of the conventional ABCD 2 score cutoff as well as the NICE criteria for urgent admission to a stroke unit defined as presence of symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis ≥50%, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis ≥50%, or major cardiac source of embolism. Results— Among 697 patients with an ABCD 2 score <4, 20% required immediate consideration for emergency treatment (eg, symptomatic internal carotid stenosis ≥50% in 9.1% of patients, symptomatic intracranial stenosis in 5.0%, atrial fibrillation in 5.9%, other major cardiac source of embolism in 2.1%) in comparison to 31.6% of 497 patients with an ABCD 2 score ≥4. The sensitivity and specificity of ABCD 2 score ≥4 or NICE criteria for discriminating between patients requiring admission or not were <62% with low positive predictive values (<30%) and high negative predictive values (≥80%). Conclusions— One in 5 patients with an ABCD 2 score <4 had high-risk disease requiring urgent treatment decision-making. When triaging on an ABCD 2 score, we recommend adding systematic carotid ultrasound (or a default angiographic CT scan) and electrocardiography within 24 hours before postponing complete transient ischemic attack evaluation.
Amarenco et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Transient ischemic attack or minor stroke (n=1,176). ABCD2 score <4 vs. ABCD2 score ≥4 was evaluated on Requirement for urgent admission to a stroke unit (symptomatic internal carotid or intracranial artery stenosis ≥50%, or major cardiac source of embolism). An ABCD2 score <4 failed to safely rule out high-risk disease, with 20% of these patients requiring urgent treatment compared to 31.6% of patients with a score ≥4.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: