Winter feeding represents a significant cost in beef production, requiring efficient strategies that maintain productivity while minimizing environmental impact. Forty-six pregnant cows (620 ± 61 kg BW) were used to evaluate an ad libitum hay-based diet (2.02 Mcal/kg ME; HFOR; n = 23) versus a corn-based diet (2.84 Mcal/kg ME) limit-fed at 1.2% BW (HCON; n = 23) from 50 d pre-calving to 84 d post-calving. Pre- and post-calving, HCON cows consumed less (p < 0.01) dry matter, crude protein, and water than HFOR cows. While CH4 yield per kg DMI was greater (p < 0.01) for HCON cows, total daily CH4 emissions and CH4 per unit of NEm intake were lower (p ≤ 0.03) compared with HFOR cows. Behavioral data showed that HCON cows had fewer (p < 0.01) meals and spent less time eating, but had greater intake per minute. Cow BW differed by treatment over time (p < 0.01), with HCON cows weighing less through early lactation, though no differences were observed from d 84 to weaning. Calf BW remained unaffected (p ≥ 0.76). In conclusion, limit-feeding a corn-based diet improves feed and water use efficiency and reduces enteric CH4 emissions without compromising calf growth, offering a viable alternative to traditional forage-based wintering systems.
Wehrbein et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: