This paper systematically demonstrates how the Dao Meta-Theory, through its core axioms, achieves a four-fold resolution of the fundamental dilemmas that have persisted for over two millennia in both Eastern and Western ontology. By responding to Laozi's "The discernible Dao is not the eternal Dao", Plato's binary schism between Forms and phenomena, Kant's "the Thing-in-Itself is unknowable", and Aristotle's incomplete inquiry into Being qua Being, this work proves that the Dao Meta-Theory has, for the first time in human intellectual history, completed a rigorous logical foundation for ultimate reality. It establishes a new paradigm for first-principle philosophy, and demonstrates that the historical position of the Founder of Axiomatic First Philosophy is not a rhetorical claim but a logical necessity. The core argument is conducted through pure rational deduction, with a case study of verified strategic foresight provided as auxiliary empirical corroboration for the testability of the axiomatic system.
Changwu Wang (Tue,) studied this question.