Abstract A key challenge in neuroscience is inferring relationships between brain structure and function from high-dimensional, multimodal neuroimaging data. While conventional multivariate approaches often simplify statistical assumptions and estimate one-dimensional independent sources shared across modalities, the true relationships between latent sources are likely more complex—statistical dependence may exist both within and between modalities and span more than one dimension per modality. Here we introduce Multimodal Subspace Independent Vector Analysis (MSIVA), a method for capturing both joint and unique vector sources from multiple data modalities by defining cross-modal and unimodal subspaces with variable dimensions. MSIVA enables flexible estimation of varying-size independent subspaces within modalities and their one-to-one linkage to corresponding subspaces across modalities. Crucially, it captures subject-level variability at the voxel level within independent subspaces, in contrast to traditional methods that share identical independent components across subjects. We evaluated three initialization workflows with five candidate subspace structures in multiple synthetic datasets and two large multimodal neuroimaging datasets, including structural MRI (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI). After confirming that MSIVA successfully recovered ground-truth subspace structures in synthetic data, we applied MSIVA to identify latent subspace structures in neuroimaging data. Subsequent subspace-specific canonical correlation analysis, brain-phenotype prediction, and voxelwise brain-age delta analysis revealed that MSIVA sources were strongly associated with multiple phenotype variables, including age, sex, schizophrenia, lifestyle factors, and cognitive functions. Further, we identified modality- and group-specific brain regions related to age (for example, cerebellum, precentral gyrus, and cingulate gyrus in sMRI; occipital lobe and superior frontal gyrus in fMRI), sex (for example, cerebellum in sMRI, frontal lobe in fMRI, and precuneus in both sMRI and fMRI), and schizophrenia (for example, cerebellar, frontal, and insular cortices in sMRI; occipital pole, lingual gyrus, and precuneus in fMRI), shedding light on linked phenotypic and neuropsychiatric biomarkers of brain structure and function.
Li et al. (Thu,) studied this question.