Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data from Sentinel-1 enable land cover classification independent of cloud cover and illumination; however, classification performance is affected by inherent speckle noise. This study evaluates the influence of eight speckle filtering algorithms on classification accuracy using Sentinel-1 Ground Range Detected (GRD) data across five contrasting terrain types in eastern Slovakia (mountain, forest, urban, cropland, and water). Speckle suppression was assessed using Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), and Equivalent Number of Looks (ENL). Classification performance was quantified using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HistGB) under VV, VH, and dual-polarization (VV + VH) configurations with repeated balanced sampling. Classification accuracy varies across terrain types. In croplands, Lee Sigma combined with SVM in VV + VH mode achieved Overall Accuracy (OA) = 0.746 ± 0.010, whereas in mountainous areas, OA = 0.838 ± 0.005 was achieved with Intensity-Driven Adaptive Neighborhood (IDAN) filtering. Urban areas achieved OA = 0.890 ± 0.006, whereas forest classification remained limited (best OA = 0.582 ± 0.011). Water surfaces approached saturation accuracy (OA ≈ 0.9998). Dual polarization improved performance in heterogeneous environments but had a limited effect in homogeneous classes. The results show that terrain structure influences the interaction between speckle filtering and classification performance.
Kseňak et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: