Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Debugging consumes significant time and effort in any major software development project. Moreover, even after the root cause of a bug is identified, fixing the bug is non-trivial. Given this situation, automated program repair methods are of value. In this paper, we present an automated repair method based on symbolic execution, constraint solving and program synthesis. In our approach, the requirement on the repaired code to pass a given set of tests is formulated as a constraint. Such a constraint is then solved by iterating over a layered space of repair expressions, layered by the complexity of the repair code. We compare our method with recently proposed genetic programming based repair on SIR programs with seeded bugs, as well as fragments of GNU Coreutils with real bugs. On these subjects, our approach reports a higher success-rate than genetic programming based repair, and produces a repair faster.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nguyen et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ead71a14f152feaf9b1cb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/2486788.2486890
Hoang Duong Thien Nguyen
University of Waterloo
Dawei Qi
China Tobacco
Abhik Roychoudhury
National University of Singapore
National University of Singapore
IBM (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: