Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Temporal eating patterns (TEPs) are associated with diet quality and obesity, although inconsistencies exist because of variations in methods and input variables. Direct comparisons of analytical approaches for deriving TEPs are rare. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare latent class analysis (LCA) and modified dynamic time warping (MDTW)-based cluster analysis for deriving TEPs and examine their associations with diet quality and obesity. METHODS: , and AUC. RESULTS: Both methods identified 3 distinct TEPs. Class 1/Cluster 1 had peaks during 07:00-09:00, 12:00, and 18:00-19:00 h ("conventional" pattern). Class 2/Cluster 2 had later peaks in EOs or EI (after 13:00 h). Class 3/Cluster 3 showed modest, evenly spaced EOs or EI concentrated earlier in the day. Membership overlap between similar TEPs was 56.2%-73.1%, with fair agreement (κ = 0.38, P < 0.001). Class 1/Cluster 1 showed higher diet quality than Class 2/Cluster 2, respectively, whereas no significant associations were observed with BMI. LCA explained slightly more variance in diet quality (6% compared with 4%) compared with MDTW-based clustering, with a similar proportion observed for BMI (∼13%). The AUCs for discriminating high diet quality (LCA: 0.635 compared with MDTW: 0.616; P = 0.565) and obesity (LCA: 0.758 compared with MDTW: 0.756; P = 0.934) were not significantly different between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: LCA and MDTW-based clustering identified comparable, but noninterchangeable TEPs. LCA may suit diet quality research, whereas MDTW-based clustering may suit multidimensional dietary/health data.
Jima et al. (Wed,) studied this question.