Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Delegated quantum computing (DQC) allows clients with low quantum capabilities to outsource computations to a server hosting a quantum computer. This process is often envisioned within the measurement-based quantum computing framework, as it naturally facilitates blindness of inputs and computation. Hence, the overall process of setting up and conducting the computation encompasses a sequence of three stages: preparing the qubits, entangling the qubits to obtain the resource state, and measuring the qubits to run the computation. There are two primary approaches to distributing these stages between the client and the server that impose different constraints on cryptographic techniques and experimental implementations. In the prepare-and-send setting, the client prepares the qubits and sends them to the server, while in the receive-and-measure setting, the client receives the qubits from the server and measures them. Although these settings have been extensively studied independently, their interrelation and whether setting-dependent theoretical constraints are inevitable remain unclear. By implementing the key components of most DQC protocols in the respective missing setting, we provide a method to build prospective protocols in both settings simultaneously and to translate existing protocols from one setting into the other.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wiesner et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f24fc11edbd3546bdbeea — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3800578
Fabian Wiesner
Technische Universität Berlin
Jens Eisert
Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute
Anna Pappa
Technische Universität Berlin
ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing
Freie Universität Berlin
Technische Universität Berlin
Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: