Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
CIRET has set up an AI research group to highlight the need for human ethical mediation in theage of digital technology and binary logic. Francisco Varela has observed that cognition can take place inthe computer field without appealing to consciousness. Yet human decision-making cannot be the resultof cognition alone and requires the interaction between cognition and consciousness. In fact, rationalistand reductionist models borrowed from the hard sciences have only shown a mechanistic vision of AI ora biological-environmental vision, which cannot be applied to complex human phenomena occurring in agrey zone. In this grey or fuzzy zone of mediation, conciliation, and repair, we need the dialectical processor dialogue between consciousness and cognition. In this context, the proposal of mediating leaders andmanagers appears as a possible ethical alternative to demonstrate that consciousness is beyond the logicof the computer. Humans must remain responsible for all the effective decisions that will help us solveproblems theoretically and concretely. We therefore need an emerging global wisdom that flows from ourconversations about AI and appeals to human consciousness at all its levels of reality. This group produceda Symposium on November 21 and 22, 2023, in which we imagine that AI may be at the service of humanevolution and resiliency in “learning to be societies” instead of contributing to block our evolutions: if AIremains a work tool. . . Certainly it will because the creation sparkles still a mystery for men themselves.
Admin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.