Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Given the high costs of software testing and fixing bugs after release, early detection of bugs using static analysis can result in significant savings. However, despite their many benefits, recent availability of many such tools, and evidence of a positive return-on-investment, static-analysis tools are not used widely because of various usability and usefulness problems. The usability inhibitors include the lack of features, such as capabilities to merge reports from multiple tools and view warning deltas between two builds of a system. The usefulness problems are related primarily to the accuracy of the tools: identification of false positives (or, spurious bugs) and uninteresting bugs among the true positives. In this paper, we present the details of an online portal, developed at IBM Research, to address these problems and promote the adoption of static-analysis tools. We report our experience with the deployment of the portal within the IBM developer community. We also highlight the problems that we have learned are important to address, and present our approach toward solving some of those problems.
Nanda et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: