Does NT-proBNP correlate with LVEF and discriminate heart failure phenotypes in a large patient database?
NT-proBNP correlates negatively with LVEF and provides good discrimination for heart failure diagnosis and phenotypes, supporting its complementary diagnostic role.
Background Measurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are used in diagnosing heart failure (HF). The main aim was to explore the correlation between NT-proBNP and LVEF. Methods Patient data for 14,962 patients were extracted from medical records and national registries and compiled in the Swedish DEMONSTRATE database. HF phenotype was categorized according to LVEF level: HF with reduced EF (≤40%, HFrEF); HF with mildly reduced EF (41–49%, HFmrEF); HF with preserved EF (≥50%, HFpEF). Spearman’s rank was employed for correlation analysis and ROC curves for discrimination and classification. Results NT-proBNP correlated negatively with LVEF level (r = −0.40) and positively with age (r = 0.49), creatinine (r = 0.35), and cystatin C (r = 0.53). Individuals with an HF diagnosis were more likely to have higher NT-proBNP levels compared to those without. The association between NT-proBNP and LVEF remained statistically significant ( P < .0001) also after adjusting for age and kidney function estimates (r = −0.20). NT-proBNP discriminated well between HFrEF (AUC = 0.80) and HFpEF (AUC = 0.78). In discriminating the presence of an HF diagnosis, NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.81) outperformed LVEF (AUC = 0.75). However, on an individual level the correlation between LVEF and NT-proBNP was modest. Conclusions NT-proBNP levels increase when LVEF deteriorates but with large inter-individual differences. Further research is needed, but these findings show potential in optimizing the use of LVEF with the aid of sequential analysis of NT-proBNP as a complementary diagnostic and prognostic tool to enhance assessment of cardiac function.
Lundgren et al. (Mon,) studied this question.