Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chapter 36 Decomposing Graphs into Regions of Small Diameter* Nathan Linialt Michael %.lss~ A decomposition of a graph G = (V, E) is a partition of the vertex set into subsets (called lhks). The diameter of a decomposition is the least. d such that any two vertices belonging to the same connected component of a block are at distance < d. In this paper we prove (nearly best possible) statements of the form: .4ny n–vertex graph has a decomposition into a small number of blocks each having small diameter. Such decompositions provide a tool for efficiently decentralizing distributed computations. In AGLP1 it was shown that every graph has a decomposition into at most s(n) blocks of diameter at most s(n) for s(n) = ~o(~loglog d h n). usinga,technique of Awerbuch [A and Awerbuch and Peleg AP, we improve this result by showing that every graph has a decomposition of diameter ()(log n) into O(log n) blocks. In addition, we give a randomized distributed algorithm that produces such a decomposition and runs in time 0(log2 n). The construction can be parametrized to provide decompositions that trade-off between the number of blocks and the diameter. We show that this trade-off is nearly best possible for two families of graphs the first consists of skeletons of certain triangulations of a simplex and the second consists of grid graphs with added diagonals. The proofs in both cases rely on basic results in combinatorial topology, Sperner’s lemma for the first class and Tucker’s lemma for the second. *This work was supported in part by NSF contracts DMS87-03541 and CCR-8911388 tDepartment of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. + ‘Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Mail Code C-014, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0114.
Linial et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: