Borderline hypertension was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of raised carotid lesions compared to normotensive controls (1.2% vs 0.3%, P<0.001).
Cross-Sectional (n=124)
Is borderline hypertension associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness compared to normotension?
Borderline hypertension is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness across multiple carotid segments, primarily driven by blood pressure levels and their interaction with other risk factors.
Absolute Event Rate: 1.2% vs 0.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
To define the role played by various risk and behavioral factors in the increase of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) observed in borderline hypertensives. Using B-mode ultrasonography, we compared 97 borderline hypertensives enrolled in the HARVEST study to 27 normotensive controls. Intima-media thickness was measured in the right and left common carotid artery, bulb, and internal carotid artery. Mean IMT (m-IMT), maximum IMT (M-IMT), the mean of M-IMT (M-MAX), and the prevalence of raised lesions (IMT>1 mm) were established. Compared to the controls, higher systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial blood pressure levels and body mass index (BMI) were present in the borderline hypertensives, whereas age, smoking, physical activity, serum cholesterol, and triglycerides were similar. After adjusting for age, sex, heart rate, BMI, smoking, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and physical activity, higher values of m-IMT and M-IMT were present in most carotid segments of borderline hypertensives compared with controls. After further adjustment for systolic BP and diastolic BP, differences were no longer significant. The adjusted M-MAX was 0.59+/-0.12 in borderline hypertensives compared with 0.50+/-0.10 in controls (P<0.001). After adjustment for systolic BP and diastolic BP it was 0.58+/-0.11 in borderline hypertensives compared with 0.50+/-0.12 in controls (P<0.005). In the various carotid segments, the prevalence of raised lesions was 1. 2% in borderline hypertensives compared with 0.3% in controls (P<0. 001). In the multivariate analysis m-IMT, M-IMT, and M-MAX were related to ambulatory mean arterial pressure, systolic BP and diastolic BP, serum cholesterol and triglycerides, BMI, age, and physical activity. Higher IMT values were found in subjects who were physically active than in those who were sedentary. In borderline hypertensives, an increase in IMT takes place not only in the common carotid artery but also in the bulb and the internal carotid segment. Blood pressure levels are a main determinant of m-IMT while the interaction of BP with other risk factors such as age and plasma lipids is more relevant for advanced intima-media thickening such as M-MAX.
Pauletto et al. (Sat,) conducted a cross-sectional in Borderline hypertension (n=124). Borderline hypertension vs. Normotensive controls was evaluated on Prevalence of raised carotid lesions (IMT >1 mm) (p=<0.001). Borderline hypertension was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of raised carotid lesions compared to normotensive controls (1.2% vs 0.3%, P<0.001).