This paper presents AeroelasticQ, a modular, high-performance aeroelastic simulation code for wind turbines, with particular emphasis on future applicability to multi-rotor configurations. The framework is organized into three core components: a flexible-blade structural solver, an airfoil-based aerodynamic solver, and a two-mesh aero-structural mapping module for transferring loads and kinematics between the aerodynamic and structural discretization. The implementation is written in C++17 using the Eigen linear algebra library (v5.0.0), and OpenMP (v5.1) is employed to enable rotor-level parallel execution for multi-rotor applications. The structural dynamics are formulated using Kane’s dynamic method combined with modal superposition, while the aerodynamic loads are computed using three-dimensional blade element momentum theory. The coupled and uncoupled modules are validated in the time domain against OpenFAST (v4.1.2) AeroDyn, ElastoDyn, and the coupled AeroDyn–ElastoDyn configuration using the NREL 5 MW reference wind turbine. The rotor-level aerodynamic validation gives mean absolute errors of 8.94 × 10−4, 2.82 × 10−4, and 2.71 × 10−5 for Ct, Cp, and Cq, respectively, while the coupled aeroelastic cases show close agreement in blade tip deflections, blade root loads, and aerodynamic power. A rigid three-rotor verification confirms the multi-rotor load-aggregation framework, with tower base thrust and overturning moment errors below 1.5% and 2% NRMSE, respectively, in both all rotors operating and one operating/two-parked configurations. In single-thread benchmarks, AeroelasticQ achieves speedups of 5.23×, 19.69×, and 3.65× in the aerodynamic-only, structural-only, and fully coupled modes, respectively. In the multi-rotor benchmark, the five-rotor case achieves a parallel speedup of 2.55× with a parallel efficiency of 51%.
Qiu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: