Hybridizing concentrating solar power (CSP) with photovoltaics (PV) offers a pathway to combine low-cost daytime generation with dispatchable nighttime supply. This study compares two CSP–PV hybridization concepts for Midelt, Morocco, under a common tender-style design framework: (i) a co-located configuration in which PV and CSP interact at the grid level and (ii) an EH-integrated configuration in which an electric heater (EH) uses PV electricity to heat molten salt in a topping cycle. The main contribution of this study lies in the two-stage optimization workflow, in which leading candidates are selectively re-simulated at higher temporal resolution. This workflow is applied to a common design framework that compares EH-integrated and co-located concepts while considering multiple PV technologies and a broad set of interdependent sizing variables. A surrogate-assisted genetic algorithm evaluates more than 200, 000 candidate designs across PV technology, inverter size, TES capacity, EH capacity, and battery energy storage system (BESS) size. The optimization minimizes the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) subject to a 200 MWel export limit, a CAPEX ceiling, and a nighttime-delivery constraint of CFnight≥39%. Candidate designs are screened at 600 s and selectively re-simulated at 120 s, showing that temporal refinement affects not only KPI values but also candidate feasibility, final ranking, and preferred component sizing. The lowest-LCOE solution is the EH-integrated bifacial configuration, achieving 64. 5% overall capacity factor, CFnight=39. 1%, less than 0. 1% curtailment, a specific CAPEX of 4698/kW, and an LCOE of 7. 29 ¢/kWh. Pareto-front and parameter-trend analyses further show that stricter nighttime-delivery targets shift the dominant sizing levers and define a neighborhood of near-optimal solutions rather than a single fixed design.
Chandler et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: