Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Numerous researchers have utilized GPS-enabled vehicle data and SafeGraph mobility data to analyse human movements. However, the comparison of their ability to capture human mobility remains unexplored. This study investigates differences in human mobility using taxi trip records and the SafeGraph dataset in New York City neighbourhoods. The analysis includes neighbourhood clustering to identify population characteristics and a comparative analysis of mobility patterns. Our findings show that taxi data tends to capture human mobility to and from locations such as Lower Manhattan, where taxi demand is consistently high, while often underestimating the volume of trips originating from areas with lower taxi demand, particularly in the suburbs of NYC. In contrast, SafeGraph data excels in capturing trips to and from areas where commuting by driving one’s own car is common, but underestimates trips in pedestrian-heavy areas. The comparative analysis also sheds new light on transportation mode choices for trips across various neighbourhoods. The results of this study underscore the importance of understanding the representativeness of human mobility big data and highlight the necessity for careful consideration when selecting the most suitable dataset for human mobility research.
Jiang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: