A scoping review of 17 articles on epidemiological-macroeconomic models for livestock diseases found that over 80% of studies investigated foot-and-mouth disease in high-income settings.
Systematic Review (n=17)
This scoping review highlights the need for further development of joint epidemiological-macroeconomic models for livestock diseases, particularly incorporating feedback loops and focusing on endemic diseases in low-income settings.
Livestock disease outbreaks can generate significant macroeconomic harms, though few studies have combined epidemiological and macroeconomic analysis in a joint modelling framework. We reviewed existing approaches to epidemiological-macroeconomic modelling for livestock diseases, to identify challenges and opportunities for further model development. We systematically searched electronic databases for journal articles, preprints, working papers and grey literature. We assessed model methodologies, scope, and application to empirical data. We analysed results descriptively and provided a critical appraisal of the strength, limitations and use cases of existing methods. We found 17 articles modelling the animal health and macroeconomic outcomes of livestock disease outbreaks. Models used outputs from epidemiological model simulations linked to a macroeconomic model, with no feedback from the economy to epidemiology. Macroeconomic modelling approaches consisted of the use of computable general equilibrium models, input output models and social accounting models. The literature was heavily dominated by considerations for hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease incursions in high-income settings. Priority for future research includes efforts to model a wider array of livestock diseases in endemic and low-income settings, further consideration for socioeconomic impacts and the need for improved data. • Severe outbreaks can lead to impacts extending beyond the agricultural sector. • Included studies linked epidemiological model outputs to macroeconomic modelling. • Feedback loops from macroeconomics to epidemiology were absent in models. • Over 80 % of studies investigated foot-and-mouth disease in high-income settings. • Surveillance assessments, poverty impacts and endemic settings merit further study.
Doyle et al. (Wed,) conducted a systematic review in Livestock diseases (n=17). Epidemiological-macroeconomic models was evaluated on Model methodologies, scope, and application to empirical data. A scoping review of 17 articles on epidemiological-macroeconomic models for livestock diseases found that over 80% of studies investigated foot-and-mouth disease in high-income settings.