Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this qualitative study was to use a theory-based approach to understand the facilitators and barriers that impacted the implementation of the Primary Care Asthma Paediatric Pathway. DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured focus groups following a randomised cluster-controlled design. SETTING: 22 primary care practices in Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 37 healthcare providers participated in four focus groups to discuss the barriers and facilitators of pathway implementation. INTERVENTION: An electronic medical record (EMR) based paediatric asthma pathway, online learning modules, in-person training for allied health teams in asthma education, and a clinical dashboard for patient management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our qualitative findings are organised into three themes using the core constructs of the normalisation process theory: (1) Facilitators of implementation, (2) Barriers to implementation, and (3) Proposed mitigation strategies. RESULTS: Participants were positive about the pathway, and felt it served as a reminder of paediatric guideline-based asthma management, and an EMR-based targeted collection of tools and resources. Barriers included a low priority of paediatric asthma due to few children with asthma in their practices. The pathway was not integrated into clinic flow and there was not a specific process to ensure the pathway was used. Sites without project champions also struggled more with implementation. Despite these barriers, clinicians identified mitigation strategies to improve uptake including developing a reminder system within the EMR and creating a workflow that incorporated the pathway. CONCLUSION: (an ongoing plan for sustainability) there may have been greater uptake of the pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 25 June 2015; the registration number is: NCT02481037, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02481037?term=andrew+cave&cond=Asthma+in+Children&cntry=CA&city=Edmonton&draw=2&rank=1.
Sharpe et al. (Sun,) studied this question.