Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Practitioners routinely misuse acid suppression medications on general medical floors and inappropriately continue the drug at discharge. AIMS: To: (i) retrospectively study the appropriateness of acid suppression use on the general medical floors; (ii) characterize the patient population discharged on unnecessary acid suppression and (iii) evaluate whether patients discharged on unnecessary acid suppression continue the medicine long term. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of general medical patients admitted to an in-patient teaching service over 6 consecutive months. RESULTS: About 60% of patients lacked an indication for initiation of acid suppression and 34% of these patients were discharged on the medicine. The only independent predictor of continuation of acid suppression at discharge was longer length of stay. Multivariate analysis did not identify a characteristic distinguishing those patients discharged inappropriately on acid suppression. At 3 and 6 months of follow-up, 80% and 50% of patients, respectively, remained on acid suppression therapy without an appropriate indication. CONCLUSIONS: Our data verifies that practitioners routinely start general medical in-patients on acid suppression without an appropriate indication. Many of these prescriptions are continued at discharge for no apparent reason, leading to their long-term misuse.
Zink et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: