Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Recently, much attention has been devoted by researchers to study social and environmental disclosure among corporations. Most of the studies were conducted in developed countries, with only a handful being undertaken in developing countries. This study aims to investigate the extent of social and environmental disclosure in the annual reports of Jordanian companies and examine if the level of disclosure is influenced by size of firm, government ownership and industry. In particular, disclosure with regard to environmental issues, community involvementand human resource are examined. Using a sample of 60 companies in the manufacturing and service sectors, content analysis is used to measure the level of disclosure. The findings indicate that 85% of the companies somehow disclose social and environmental information. Human resource is the most disclosed theme while the environmental issue had the lowestdisclosure among the companies. In addition, a significant positive association is found between company size and social and environmentaldisclosure, and companies with high government ownership tend to have alower level of disclosure compared to companies with low government ownership. On the overall, no significant relationship was found betweenindustry type and the level of social and environmental disclosure. However, when only environmental issues are examined, manufacturingcompanies tend to disclose more of the items compared to service companies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ismail et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1279b8ea48cb855a34ec5e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v2i2.32
Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail
Northern University of Malaysia
Abdulhadi Ibrahim
Shaqra University
Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting
Northern University of Malaysia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: