What question did this study set out to answer?

This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of team-based learning compared to lecture-based learning in neurology education.

May 24, 2026Open Access

TBL alone or combined with other teaching methods for neurology education in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Key Points

This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of team-based learning compared to lecture-based learning in neurology education.
Conducted a comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials on TBL and LBL in neurology education.
Analyzed the pooled data using Review Manager 5.2 and STATA 15.0 software.
Included a total of 16 studies with 1267 medical students.
TBL significantly improved theoretical knowledge scores (SMD = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.54, p < 0.00001).
TBL led to better practical skill scores (SMD = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.24, p < 0.00001).
Students in the TBL group showed greater self-study ability, communication skills, teamwork ability, and satisfaction compared to the LBL group.

Abstract

Abstract Background Team-based learning (TBL) has been applied in neurology teaching. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of TBL alone or in combination with other methods versus lecture-based learning (LBL) on improving the teaching effects of neurology in China. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of TBL and LBL on neurology education in China. The Review Manager 5.2 software and STATA 15.0 software were employed for this meta-analysis of the included studies. Results A total of 16 studies involving 1267 medical students were included. The pooled results showed that compared to traditional LBL, TBL was related to higher theoretical knowledge scores and practical skill scores (SMD = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.54, p < 0.00001; SMD = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.24, p < 0.00001; respectively). Additionally, our results demonstrated the efficacy of TBL in enhancing students’ self-study ability, communication skills, and teamwork ability (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.61, p < 0.00001; SMD = 2.36, 95% CI: 0.74 to 3.98, p = 0.004; SMD = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.26, p < 0.00001; respectively ). Meanwhile, students in the TBL group were more satisfied than those in the LBL group. Conclusions Our data suggest that TBL-based teaching approaches (including TBL alone and TBL combined with other methods) may be more effective than LBL in enhancing theoretical knowledge scores and practical skill scores in Chinese neurology education. Additionally, TBL may be associated with improved self-study capacity, communication skills, teamwork ability as well as student satisfaction. However, considering the limitations such as the low methodological quality of the included studies and obvious heterogeneity, future multicenter, cross-cultural and high-quality studies are needed to validate and generalize our findings.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12965848a0ea1665673121 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09468-1

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark

View Full Paper