Traditional versus modern anticoagulant strategies: Summary of the literature

Traditional and modern anticoagulant therapies for the management, prophylaxis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and key findings of primary studies are summarized. Significant advances have been made during the past decade in the prevention and treatment of VTE and the treatment of ACS. Numerous trials have demonstrated that low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are at least as effective as and have challenged unfractionated heparins (UFHs) as the standard of care for the treatment of VTE and ACS. For VTE, a number of new antithrombotic agents have been developed and are currently under development, including oral direct thrombin inhibitors and synthetic pentasaccharides, such as fondaparinux, in addition to LMWHs. For ACS, various new treatment modalities, such as the broader use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stents, are available, in addition to new pharmacologic agents, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and innovative thrombolytics. Most of these agents and treatment modalities require the use of an anticoagulant as adjuvant therapy. Evidence suggests that LMWHs can be used safely and, in addition to being more practical, have been shown to improve outcomes compared with traditional anticoagulants in certain patient populations. LMWHs demonstrate superior clinical outcomes over traditional anticoagulants for VTE prophylaxis and treatment and ACS treatment. Primary studies of new agents, including oral direct thrombin inhibitors and synthetic pentasaccharides for the treatment of ACS are promising; however, more data are needed on their safety and efficacy.