Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In heterogeneous (electro) catalysis, the overall catalytic output results from responses of surface sites with different catalytic activities, and their discrimination in terms of what specific site is responsible for a given activity is not an easy task. Here, we use the electro-oxidation of CO as a probe reaction to access the catalytic activity of different sites on high-Miller index stepped Pt surfaces with their 110 steps selectively modified by Ru at different coverages. Data from in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry evidence that Ru deposited on 110 steps modifies the surface in a nontrivial way, favoring only the electrocatalytic oxidation of CO over 111 terraces. Moreover, these 111 terraces become catalytically active throughout a large potential window. On the other hand, after the deposition of Ru on 110 steps, the partial oxidation of a CO adlayer (by stripping voltammetry and in situ FTIR potential steps) shows that those 110 steps that remain free of Ru seem not to be influenced by the presence of this metal. As a result, the remaining CO adlayer is oxidized on these Ru-free 110 steps at potentials identical to those observed in steps of pure stepped Pt surfaces (in the absence of Ru). First, these findings suggest that COads behaves as a motionless species during its oxidation. Second, they evidence that the impact caused by the presence of Ru in the catalytic activity of Pt (s) - (n–1) (111) × (110) stepped surfaces depends on the crystallographic orientation of Pt sites. These results help us to shed new light on the role of Ru in the mechanism of oxidation of CO and allow a deeper understanding regarding the CO tolerance in Pt–Ru catalysts.
Farias et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: