Dietary treatment was inferior to conventional drug treatment in attaining diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (29% vs 73%; mean difference 44%, 95% CI 21-67%, p=0.001).
RCT (n=61)
Randomized
No
Does dietary treatment improve blood pressure and lipid concentrations compared to conventional drug treatment in obese men with mild hypertension?
Dietary treatment is inferior to conventional drug therapy (atenolol-based) for controlling mild hypertension but superior for improving lipid profiles in obese men.
Effect estimate: mean difference 44% (95% CI 21 to 67%)
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 73%
p-value: p=0.001
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dietary treatment has a similar antihypertensive effect to conventional drug treatment while being superior to drugs in improving serum lipid concentrations in obese men with mild hypertension. DESIGN: Six week run in period followed by randomisation to either diet or drug treatment groups for one year. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in city hospital. PATIENTS: 61 Men aged 40-69 years, body mass index greater than or equal to 26, diastolic blood pressure 90-104 mm Hg when untreated. Exclusion criteria were signs of organ damage secondary to hypertension and diseases that might have interfered with compliance or with interpretation of results. INTERVENTIONS: Dietary treatment was based on weight reduction, restriction of sodium, and decrease of excess alcohol intake (defined as greater than or equal to 250 g alcohol per week). Drug treatment used a stepped care approach with atenolol as drug of first choice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg; absolute reductions in blood pressure and serum lipid concentrations. RESULTS: Mean body weight decreased 7.6 kg in the diet group and increased 0.9 kg in the drug treatment group (p less than 0.0001), and mean sodium excretion decreased 42 and 10 mmol/24 h respectively (p = 0.019). There was no difference in reported alcohol intake. Mean systolic blood pressure decreased 4 mm Hg in the diet group and 16 mm Hg in the drug group (p = 0.003) and diastolic blood pressure 3 and 11 mm Hg respectively (p = 0.002). Diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg was attained by 29% of the diet group (nine men) and 73% (22) of those receiving drug treatment (mean difference 44%, 95% confidence interval 21 to 67%, p = 0.001). Dietary treatment produced decreases in mean serum concentrations of total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol as well as triglycerides and an increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration. In the drug treatment group the changes were in the opposite direction, and the groups differed significantly in all but total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary treatment was inferior to conventional drug treatment in controlling mild hypertension but superior in lowering serum concentrations of lipids.
Berglund et al. (Sat,) conducted a rct in Obese men with mild hypertension (n=61). Dietary treatment vs. Drug treatment (stepped care with atenolol) was evaluated on Diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg (mean difference 44%, 95% CI 21 to 67%, p=0.001). Dietary treatment was inferior to conventional drug treatment in attaining diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (29% vs 73%; mean difference 44%, 95% CI 21-67%, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: