Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The differences among radiologists in interpreting conventional and digitized images obtained with different radiologic procedures is an important research issue in these times of implementation and growth of the digital modalities. The authors performed a multiobserver study to determine the performance of radiologists reading posteroanterior conventional radiographs, digitized radiographs laser printed onto film, and images displayed on a high-resolution workstation (video monitor). A total of 300 images were evaluated by seven radiologists who recorded their ordinal confidence rating of the presence or absence of one or more of the following abnormalities: interstitial disease, nodule, and pneumothorax. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed statistically significant differences for the detection of different abnormalities by individual readers. The group as a whole showed a significant reduction in observer performance for the detection of interstitial disease and pneumothorax when the laser-printed radiographs or the workstation was used rather than conventional radiographs.
Slasky et al. (Thu,) studied this question.