Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Multimodal recommender systems alleviate the sparsity of historical user–item interactions. They are commonly catalogued based on the type of auxiliary data (modality) they leverage, such as preference data plus user-network (social), user/item texts (textual), or item images (visual), respectively. One consequence of this categorization is the tendency for virtual walls to arise between modalities. For instance, a study involving images would compare to only baselines ostensibly designed for images. However, a closer look at existing models’ statistical assumptions about any one modality would reveal that many could work just as well with other modalities. Therefore, we pursue a systematic investigation into several research questions: which modality one should rely on, whether a model designed for one modality may work with another, which model to use for a given modality. We conduct cross-modality and cross-model comparisons and analyses, yielding insightful results pointing to interesting future research directions for multimodal recommender systems.
Truong et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: