Conversion of CSA accelerometer output to average acceleration provided more precise estimates of movement intensity correlated with speed (r2=0.76) and heart rate (r2=0.81) than raw output.
Observational (n=15)
No
Converting CSA accelerometer output to average acceleration provides more precise estimates of movement intensity with less inter-individual variability than raw output in children.
Effect estimate: r2 = 0.76 (speed), r2 = 0.81 (heart rate)
Four Computer Science and Applications (CSA, Model 7164) accelerometers were validated against speed and heart rate in a field trial, consisting of two walking and two preset running speeds, and 3 min of running at freely chosen speeds. Fifteen children (9–11 years) were recruited from a suburban school in Denmark. Mean CSA output was calculated and converted to acceleration by calibration to sinusoidal accelerations in a mechanical setup, the latter variable being independent of frequency-based filtering. Mean CSA output and estimated acceleration both correlated significantly with speed ( r 2 = 0.55 and r 2 = 0.76, respectively) and heart rate ( r 2 = 0.60 and r 2 = 0.81, respectively), controlled for gender. ANOVA post hoc test failed to show significant differences in accelerometer output between running speeds. Inter-individual variability of CSA output and acceleration could not be explained by differences in step frequency in walking but running values correlated significantly with step frequency ( r = −0.86 and r = −0.47 for CSA output and acceleration, respectively). Conversion of CSA output to average acceleration provides more precise estimates of intensity with less inter-individual variability than raw CSA output. Different running intensities, however, are generally not well differentiated with vertical accelerometry.
Brage et al. (Fri,) reported a observational. Conversion of CSA output to average acceleration vs. Raw CSA output was evaluated on Correlation with speed and heart rate (r2 = 0.76 (speed), r2 = 0.81 (heart rate)). Conversion of CSA accelerometer output to average acceleration provided more precise estimates of movement intensity correlated with speed (r2=0.76) and heart rate (r2=0.81) than raw output.