Patient-level indicators of general ill health or complexity were the most commonly identified risk factors for preventable readmissions across 37 US studies, despite significant definitional variation.
Systematic Review (n=37)
While patient-level indicators of general ill health are commonly associated with preventable readmissions, significant definitional and methodological variations in the literature limit the ability to translate these findings into operational guidance for healthcare organizations.
BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are a leading topic of healthcare policy and practice reform because they are common, costly, and potentially avoidable events. Hospitals face the prospect of reduced or eliminated reimbursement for an increasing number of preventable readmissions under nationwide cost savings and quality improvement efforts. To meet the current changes and future expectations, organizations are looking for potential strategies to reduce readmissions. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to determine what factors are associated with preventable readmissions. METHODS: We conducted a review of the English language medicine, health, and health services research literature (2000 to 2009) for research studies dealing with unplanned, avoidable, preventable, or early readmissions. Each of these modifying terms was included in keyword searches of readmissions or rehospitalizations in Medline, ISI, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, ProQuest Health Management, and PAIS International. Results were limited to US adult populations. RESULTS: The review included 37 studies with significant variation in index conditions, readmitting conditions, timeframe, and terminology. Studies of cardiovascular-related readmissions were most common, followed by all cause readmissions, other surgical procedures, and other specific-conditions. Patient-level indicators of general ill health or complexity were the commonly identified risk factors. While more than one study demonstrated preventable readmissions vary by hospital, identification of many specific organizational level characteristics was lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature on preventable readmissions in the US contains evidence from a variety of patient populations, geographical locations, healthcare settings, study designs, clinical and theoretical perspectives, and conditions. However, definitional variations, clear gaps, and methodological challenges limit translation of this literature into guidance for the operation and management of healthcare organizations. We recommend that those organizations that propose to reward reductions in preventable readmissions invest in additional research across multiple hospitals in order to fill this serious gap in knowledge of great potential value to payers, providers, and patients.
Vest et al. (Wed,) conducted a systematic review in Preventable hospital readmissions (n=37). Patient-level indicators of general ill health or complexity were the most commonly identified risk factors for preventable readmissions across 37 US studies, despite significant definitional variation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: