This work of historical theology profiles the unique role of Sergius Bulgakov (1877–1944) in the unfolding of Russian Orthodox theology over the last century. It narrates the role in his thought of the contested figure of Sophia (the personification of divine wisdom), with special focus on to how his creative appropriation of this ancient concept led him to propose modifications of the church’s doctrines of creation and deification. Our focus on deification acknowledges that patristic sources regarding this topic were only made ready for Russian theological research in the first decades of the twentieth century. Concurrently, another novelty came into vogue among the Russian intelligentsia during these same years: the evocation of both esoteric and biblical versions of Sophia, along with the promulgation of an original theological framework known as sophiology, a development pioneered by Vladimir Solovyov. These unique cultural and religious vectors, deification, creation theology, and sophiology, and their relation to Orthodox trinitarianism, converged around the year 1910 in the life and scholarship of Sergius Bulgakov, while also being firmly resisted by conservatives. A brilliant, wide-ranging, and independent thinker, Bulgakov began as a Marxist economist whose midlife conversion led him to the priesthood and a professorship at a prominent Russian seminary. Bulgakov went on to create one of the last century’s most ambitious and creative Orthodox systematic theologies, an endeavor made possible through his sheer mastery of numerous scholarly sources that, over three decades, he explicated in light of the emergence of sophiology, the worldview of which he became the leading proponent. Against opposition by colleagues at the St. Sergius Theological Institute, where he served as dean, Bulgakov expanded sophiology into a panentheistic theological system that highlighted and integrated concepts of religious living, deification, and cosmology within a vast panoply of other Christian theological dogmas that he examined. This introductory historical account summarizes a selection of Bulgakov’s pioneering innovations, with special emphasis on the reception of his ideas during his lifetime and the decades since.
Byron Belitsos (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: