Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
With the proposed introduction of a common framework for comparing qualifications within the Union (EU), as a result of the Lisbon agreement of 2000, the question of commonly agreed concepts of skills and qualifications is has become a pressing political and issue. The paper argues that there are grounds for doubting that there is a ready of the English terms 'skill'and 'qualification' in a way that avoids problems of and calibrating German and English vocational qualifications. Reasons for this are explored, the most important of which relate to: a) the conceptual structure of skill its cognates in the two languages; b) the differing socio-political role of qualifications; c) industrial structures and labour processes; d) differences in institutions regulating education and training (VET). These problems are discussed in relation to examples of industries and occupations and apparently similar levels of qualification in England and.
Clarke et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: