Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIM: In a resource-poor country such as India, telepsychiatry could be an economical method to expand health-care services. This study was planned to compare the costing and feasibility of three different service delivery models. The end user was a state-funded long-stay Rehabilitation Center (RC) for the homeless. METHODOLOGY: Model A comprised patients going to a tertiary care center for clinical care, Model B was community outreach service, and Model C comprised telepsychiatry services. The costing included expenses incurred by the health system to complete a single consultation for a patient on an outpatient basis. It specifically excluded the cost borne by the care-receiver. No patients were interviewed for the study. RESULTS: The RC had 736 inmates, of which 341 had mental illness of very long duration. On comparing the costing, Model A costed 6047. 5 INR (100), Model B costed 577. 1 INR (9. 1), and Model C costed 137. 2 INR (2. 2). Model C was found fifty times more economical when compared to Model A and four times more economical when compared to Model B. CONCLUSION: Telepsychiatry services connecting tertiary center and a primary health-care center have potential to be an economical model of service delivery compared to other traditional ones. This resource needs to be tapped in a better fashion to reach the unreached.
Moirangthem et al. (Mon,) studied this question.