Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Modern scientific research isn't possible without software. However, its vital role is often overlooked by funders, universities, assessment committees, and even the research community itself. This is a serious issue that needs urgent attention. This article raises a number of points concerning quality, code review, and openness; development practices and training in scientific computing; career recognition of research software engineers; and sustainability models for funding scientific software. We must get software recognized to be the first-class experimental scientific instrument that it is and get "better software for better research."
Carole Goble (Thu,) studied this question.