A clinical decision rule combining simple clinical features and NT-proBNP testing will be prospectively validated for its diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness in identifying heart failure among 500 primary care patients.
Observational (n=500)
Single-blind
Yes
Does a clinical decision rule, NT-proBNP testing, or their combination improve the diagnostic accuracy of heart failure in symptomatic primary care patients aged 55 and older compared to GP clinical judgment alone?
This study protocol outlines a prospective validation of a clinical decision rule and NT-proBNP testing to improve the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of heart failure diagnosis in primary care.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. As mortality rates are high, it is important that patients seen by general practitioners with symptoms suggestive of heart failure are identified quickly and treated appropriately. Identifying patients with heart failure or deciding which patients need further tests is a challenge. All patients with suspected heart failure should be diagnosed using objective tests such as echocardiography, but it is expensive, often delayed, and limited by the significant skill shortage of trained echocardiographers. Alternative approaches for diagnosing heart failure are currently limited. Clinical decision tools that combine clinical signs, symptoms or patient characteristics are designed to be used to support clinical decision-making and validated according to strict methodological procedures. The REFER Study aims to determine the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of our previously derived novel, simple clinical decision rule, a natriuretic peptide assay, or their combination, in the triage for referral for echocardiography of symptomatic adult patients who present in general practice with symptoms suggestive of heart failure. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, Phase II observational, diagnostic validation study of a clinical decision rule, natriuretic peptides or their combination, for diagnosing heart failure in primary care. Consecutive adult primary care patients 55 years of age or over presenting to their general practitioner with a chief complaint of recent new onset shortness of breath, lethargy or peripheral ankle oedema of over 48 hours duration, with no obvious recurrent, acute or self-limiting cause will be enrolled. Our reference standard is based upon a three step expert specialist consensus using echocardiography and clinical variables and tests. DISCUSSION: Our clinical decision rule offers a potential solution to the diagnostic challenge of providing a timely and accurate diagnosis of heart failure in primary care. Study results will provide an evidence-base from which to develop heart failure care pathway recommendations and may be useful in standardising care. If demonstrated to be effective, the clinical decision rule will be of interest to researchers, policy makers and general practitioners worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17635379.
Tait et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Suspected heart failure (n=500). Clinical decision rule and NT-proBNP testing vs. Reference standard (echocardiography and clinical assessment) was evaluated on Test performance of the clinical decision rule (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) for diagnosis of heart failure. A clinical decision rule combining simple clinical features and NT-proBNP testing will be prospectively validated for its diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness in identifying heart failure among 500 primary care patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: