The 16th edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma newly distinguishes pTis from pT1a to improve international translatability with the WHO classification and UICC TNM system. However, the histologic boundary between intraepithelial neoplasia and lamina propria invasion remains difficult in routine practice. We retrospectively evaluated interobserver agreement in 50 gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection lesions randomly selected from 238 lesions previously diagnosed as intramucosal carcinoma under the 15th edition criteria. For each lesion, two representative histologic images were independently reviewed by 10 pathologists, who classified each lesion as pTis or pT1a according to predefined architectural criteria. Complete agreement was obtained in 21 lesions, including 10 unanimously diagnosed as pTis and 11 as pT1a, whereas 29 showed disagreement. Overall agreement was moderate, with a Fleiss' kappa value of 0.483. Discordant lesions involved fused or anastomosing glands, cribriform-like structures, crawling or lateral expansion-like patterns, and invasion mimics related to erosion, artifact, or mucosal remodeling. These findings indicate that distinguishing true invasive architecture from morphologic mimics is central to reproducible implementation of the revised classification.
Omote et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: