Traditional grammatical theories, particularly those rooted in Indo-European languages, conceptualize the clause as a fundamental syntactic unit consisting of a verb and its overt arguments. However, studies of spontaneous conversation across diverse languages reveal that interactants often organize utterances around predicates, omitting explicit subjects and objects when referents are recoverable from context. By combining Conversation Analysis with frequency analysis, the present study illustrates that the preference for predicate-centered utterances in Korean conversation is robust, even in sequential environments where interactants have addressed understanding problems arising from argument omission through repair sequences. Specifically, interactants tend to maintain predicate-centered utterances after repair, showing little inclination to shift toward using overt arguments. These findings support the view that predicates serve as the central unit of utterance construction and underscore the need to re-examine the nature of grammar to fully account for the context-sensitive and interactional dynamics of language use.
Jeong et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: